General Process for Conducting Peer Reviews of Teaching at IU School of Medicine
The faculty member wishing to undergo a peer review of teaching…
-
Identifies a peer reviewer
-
The faculty member should attempt to identify a peer reviewer on their own, either from their department or external to their department. For details on who can be a peer reviewer and whom to ask to facilitate a review, view the Peer Review of Teaching page, starting with the “Who can conduct a peer review of teaching?” panel.
-
If the faculty member is unable to identify a peer reviewer, they may ask Faculty Affairs and Professional Development (FAPD) to facilitate a review by completing the online request for a peer review of teaching. An FAPD team member will respond to the faculty member with details about conducting the review. FAPD schedules a meeting between you and the reviewer.
-
-
Holds a pre-review meeting with the reviewer (approximately 30 minutes). The meeting should include:
-
A discussion of goals of the peer review
-
A mutual editing of the peer review template (found below) to reflect the teaching scenario and review goals
-
A sharing of teaching materials that should be included in the review
-
The reviewer…
-
Conducts the review. A synchronous review should include about an hour (if possible) of observation of both the learner and faculty member.
-
Completes the peer review form during and after the observation.
-
Schedules a post-review meeting with the reviewee, reviewing the draft review form with the reviewee, and discussing an action plan for future improvements.
-
Revises the completed peer review form and sends it to the reviewee. The form now becomes the property of the reviewee.
Downloads
A note about the templates: The reviewer and reviewee should collaboratively edit the review template to remove items not applicable to the teaching situation being observed. You should not use the template as-is.
Peer Review Discussion Guides
Download Peer Review Form Templates
Sample Completed Peer Reviews